Principles of Biology

Pre-instruction. Nested discussion. Accessing background knowledge. Characterizing preconceptions. Developing questions. Baseline reflection. All based upon one word scrawled on the whiteboard: "EVOLUTION."

That was today's lesson in a nutshell. To some a serious of eduspeak buzzwords and catch-phrases. To others, a perfectly sensible introductory experience engineered to develop a rich baseline of thought on a tremendously complex and daunting subject: evolution.

The comments here are first thoughts on evolution, pre-instruction. Today was an ordered circus of silent independent reflection mixed with lineups, various pairings for 1:1 discussions, small group discussions, summative sharing of these discussions, followed by reflective "blogging" on preconceptions and questions for our study of biological evolution.

Below is a baseline to work from on the fundamental biological concept of evolution.......

Tags: backgroundknowledge, discussion, evolution, misconception, preconception, prewrite, reflection, schema

Share

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

First of all I missed most of the class period, so I missed the discussion.
Evolution… I believe that evolution is the change of genetics to better adapt to the environment. I have heard of the big bang theory and of that God created everything, but I am not sure which one I believe in. This might sound different but is there a way to combine the big bang theory and that God created everything? Another question I have would be how long and in depth is the task of a species being able to change there genetics to better mach the environment?
Looks like I have a lot of research to do.

Reply to This

Evolution, the changes of something over time to better adapt. You mostly realize this in animals, but it can occur in other things like viruses. Wile reading “10 Genes, Furiously Evolving” I saw that viruses can transfer to different species. Also how viruses can evolve to different forms to transfer from host to host. I may not know how viruses do this or if they could combine with other viruses to make new ones, but I going to find out. Evolution can get confusing.

Reply to This

This wed site consists of Parallel vs. Convergent evolution and then more info on Parallel evolution. Parallel evolution is the independent evolution closely related lineages, where several species respond to similar challenges in a similar way. Convergent evolution is the attainment of the same biological trait in unrelated lineages. A good example of Parallel evolution is between the placentals and marsupials. They shared the same ecosystem in South America, in Australia, marsupials survived and in the Old World the placentals won. They had small amount of space until the extinction of the dinosaurs were they now had more land and took on more roles. Some were great at there environment but similar species were found on different continents. So similar traits can be found with similar species.

Reply to This

When I first started learning about evolution I heard mostly about Charles Darwin’s theory of Natural Selection, but I wanted to learn if there is any more theories of evolution. Then I was taught of Lamarkes theory of use and disuse, where traits that are used most will pass on, where traits that aren’t used as much will not go on. But I learned that there is also sexual evolution were traits that are chosen by the female will be passed on to another generation.
Some other things I learned was of Comparative Anatomy, this is homologous structures resemble others. An example is the comparison of the human hand, bats wings and whale flipper. We also talked about mutations and that 99% of them are negative, this made me think of what are the good mutations?

Reply to This

(Prior to instruction) Well I am no evolution nut, but I did think that I knew something about it. I knew the pictures of the ape to human, and I had heard of the big bang theory... but I know nothing about it. I had also heard of Darwin, but didn't know what he did...

The graphic organizer that was given to us made us start to think of other things, and I got really confused, because I really had no idea what a lot of the words had to do with evolution.

My questions were what is the theory of evolution, and what did Charles Darwin do for biological evolution.

Reply to This

(With instruction) I think that I grasp the concept of evolution better now. In class we have spent a lot of time talking about not only the biological side of evolution, but what evolution really is. It is change over time; but how much time?

That is what puts the brakes on understanding it completely for me. I mean you can't see evolution happening. Or can you? There are some types that you can and some types that you can't.

Another thing that got cleared up for me was that the idea of Social Darwinism didn't come from Charles Darwin, and that Charles Darwin did not say anywhere in his book that we came for monkeys. I mean now that I think about it, and Mr. Nash told us, if we came from monkeys, monkeys wouldn't still be here.

DUH!! :-)

Reply to This

(Final reflection) I will admit that I had no clue what evolution was before we discussed it in this class. I think that I have a better understanding of what the all around idea of evolution is though.

I now know that there are many different evidences that evolution is a real thing such as fossil evolution, biogeography, embryology, comparative anatomy and molecular biology. Learning about these different evidences made me realize that evolution is real, and that evolution doesn't happen over night.

I really think that the hardest part of understanding evolution for me is that I can't see it happening, but with seeing evidence that it has happened, makes me understand it a little more.

Another big thing that I learned was that Charles Darwin didn't say that we evolved from monkeys, people pretty much made that up.

I really think that I understand evolution a lot more, but there is much more that I could learn.

Reply to This

Whoops, forgot to do this. But here is exactly what I had written down on my paper before any instruction.

Some people believe that we evolved from monkeys because we are so closely related or whatever, which is evolution. But I don't believe that to be true. I do believe that species can evolve like to adapt other characteristics to better survive in their environment or whatever, but that's more like bettering the species for survival not so much creating new ones necessarily, which is what the whole we evolved from monkeys thing is. Unless we are monkeys, but according to science or whoever you ask I guess we are humans not monkeys.
But how does evolution take place? How do we know that something has evolved if we don't see it happening throughout the generations? Do we assume that's it's a new species because of that? (If we find a species that is completely different from anything we've ever seen before, but it's really a different species that we have heard of but it's just changed a bit). What determines something as evolution?

Plus if we evolved from monkeys, we wouldn't monkeys have died out? They would have all became humans, leaving no more monkeys in the world. And as far as I know, there are still plenty of monkeys running around. (Not here in st. joe no, but in their natural habitats or zoos)
I think that evolution is just a theory that some scientists came up with, by looking at genes and similarities between different species, like humans and monkeys. But faith would also have an effect on what you think about evolution, whether you believe in it or not. I think that there must be some sort of middle ground in evolution.

Reply to This

I saw this site and found it interesting. I mean I never really thought that Hobbits were real. I just thought that it was something that like J.K. Rowling made up for Lord of the Rings. But they found fossils and hobbit bones from way back when on a remote island. They are comparing their bones to the modern human and seeing what things are similar between us. We might have evolved from them in a way.

Reply to This

okay so i was not here the day we did the first post i was having surgery but i remember what my first thoughts were,

-that humans came from monkeys
-that only the strong survive
-and that the big bang had something to do with evolution

All this concepts were in some way a little off

-Humans did not come from monkey rather might be distant distant reletives through evolution
-Not the strong but the best fit as in color or size for an area
-and the last one is a misconception

this is just minor things i learned from the evolution teaching so far

Reply to This

my thought about evolution has changed from the beginning to the end and after nash's talk about the above being, i think it is way more clear to me now.. his talk changed my out look that you can believe both acuzations that are made the one about god and the theory by darwin.... i know tons of more stuff now than two weeks ago.

Reply to This

so, i never did my first post, so here that goes. . . you wrote evolution on the board, and i thought about a lot of things. one thing really weighed heavily on my heart was religion. I'm a firm believer in christ, and for someone to tell me that i'm wrong in what i believe, or that having faith in something that is made up or fictional, that is a tough thing for me to listen to. I think that is why i don't know a lot about evolution, because freshman year i thought that is what it was going to be, so i chose not to listen.

as of now my ideas of evolutions were monkeys, to cave men to man. I used to think that it was really charles darwin's theory. i knew about a fly experiement where people thought things came from the air, out from the middle of no where. i know that it deals with change in like groups of people or environments and stuff, but i'm not sure what all it entails.

Reply to This

RSS

Featured where?

Our Visitors

Locations of visitors to this page

Google Apps

GOOGLE APPS for Education Logo

Students login HERE for SJSD Google Apps for Education.

About

Sean Nash Sean Nash created this social network on Ning.

Latest Activity

Add information- When you take species out of the environment you also take away more then just that, each speacies contributes to each other. For example if you take a spider away you become over populated with species such as flies, therefor yo...
31 seconds ago
During this class periods (that I mostly missed) my personal goal was to learn how i can make my diet better then it is now. I figured out what specific parts of the ingredients are good, bad or which one you should look at according to your bodie...
31 minutes ago
The food that I brought was apples and Wheat Thins. The apple slices were healthy. I know this because it was 100% Carbohydrates and nothing else. I think that the carbohydrates came from fructose mainly. The Wheat Thins, then, were obviously the...
39 minutes ago
In the discussion i choose raisins and ho-ho's. I choose the raisins as the healthy food because it is a dried fruit so i figured it didn't have very much fat. I choose the snack cake as the unhealthy food because it had a large amount of calories...
1 hour ago
Well my healthy food that I chose was an apple, because I usually eat around 2 a week so I figured that would be the perfect healthy food for me to look up. I figured it was healthy because for one it's a fruit, it's natural, and it doesn't have a...
2 hours ago
I learned quite a bit today about "healthy" and "unhealthy" foods. From previously looking into this topic I learned that marketing plays a huge role on what foods we believe to be "healthy." My "healthy choice" is the perfect example. My healthy ...
14 hours ago
I really didn't pay any attention as to how much i ate or what i ate. Being active i really didn't care it was food so i ate it I'm sure a lot of us do the same thing. I hear all kinds of diet ads saying the fast easy way to loose weight just do t...
21 hours ago
According to the little BMR thing, I need 2041 calories per day. This opened my eyes because not everything you eat is healthy, or at least the stuff that you think is healthy really is not, and I like the fact that we learned how to calculate th...
23 hours ago
My "good" food was Nacho Cheese Doritos the reduces fat ones we get in the cafeteria. Sometimes for lunch when i get a sandwich at school. Well compared to my unhealthy one it was closer then what i thought it would be. I was comparing the labels ...
yesterday
My healthy food wasn't really a food, it was a small bottle of Gatorade. It was healthy compared to my other choice which was Kelloggs Pop Tarts. The pop tarts weren't necessarily unhealthy but they are as good for you as the Gatorade. Right now i...
yesterday
So, I'm gonna start with my "healthy" food. It was a banana! I don't eat bananas too often, but my dad buy's them a lot. They're always sitting on my counter. And honestly when I do eat them, the main reason is because it's my healthy choice over ...
yesterday
My healthy food was a Quaker Granela Bar(chocolate chunk). I will sometimes eat this food between school and cheer practice. This food was not as healthy as the food label says it is. The food label said there was 90 calories but there was acctual...
yesterday
Today when we analyzed 'healthy' & 'non-healthy' foods I brought in Apple Sauce & Nutty Bars. My 'healthy' food was apple sauce, I didn't eat it because it was hot, so yeah..I think this food is actually healthy because it has 100% carbs, and not...
yesterday
My healthy food that I chose was raw shrimp with some spices. It turned out to only have four calories: zero calories from carbs or fat, and the four came from protein. It obviously turned out to be extremely healthy. I don't eat shrimp often, but...
yesterday
Erin Nash added a discussion
Today, you analyzed a "healthy" food, as well as a food that you thought was not "healthy" In your post today, talk about when you learned when analyzing your food. Here is what I want you to consider: Tell us a little about your healthy food - ...
yesterday
Miranda Lynn Stanton updated their profile photo
yesterday
Everything we take in is good for you. Some things we cant have to much of or it is not good for you. As long as you have it in the moderation your suppose to have it in its alright.
yesterday
I would not draw the line between any of these. If we took out some of these species our world would be over populated. All of these are here for a reason. When we first had to draw the line I drew it between the poisonous snakes and the sharks. S...
yesterday
First, I had no idea that the South Beach Diet Plan wasn't a good thing to use! I was really surprised when we read that! Beside that, when it comes to the image shown above, I like when it's drawn out rather than what's shown in the prompt. To m...
on Saturday
I don't think I would take out any species, no matter how annoying or "gross" they are. They're probably all useful in some way, and I wouldn't want to be the one to mess the food chain up. Poisonous snakes, I do understand, pose a threat to human...
on Saturday

Photos

Loading…

recent visitors

© 2009   Created by Sean Nash

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Privacy  |  Terms of Service